Comments Upgrade with Avatars

Update: This is refering to my old, hand-written comment system, before I changed web hosts and switched to external comment hosting.

I started getting Asian spam in my comments in the last couple days. If you are subscribed to the comments feed you probably noticed this. The spammer was manually filling out captchas, so this wasn't a bot but rather a patient human being. Getting tired of removing these, I set up some filters to silently drop messages that fit certain criteria. By "silently" I mean the server tells the client everything went fine but the comment never actually gets written to the database.

The spammer gained nothing except annoying us because all links in comments get a rel="nofollow" attribute, which tells search engines to ignore it. That, plus small readership and captcha-solving gives little incentive for spamming.

Well anyway, while I had my sleeves rolled up and my hands on the code I decided to make some upgrades I have been wanting to do. The e-mail address is no longer displayed (stupid idea in the first place) but instead used for a Gravatar image. You can also specify a home URL, which will be linked from your name. This makes my comment system work very similarly to what you find around the web, except that I don't require anything from you but a captcha and a comment.

I also fixed a small usability issue: when you preview a comment now it takes you right down to the form rather than leaving you at the top of the page. The back-end database was also adjusted from the original pollxn design to scale better as the website grows.

Now, Gravatar is a neat concept but I have two complaints. One, I don't like centralized systems. It's a single point of failure and a single point of control. It has privacy issues. It's anti-web. It's inelegant. Decentralized systems built around self-enforcing protocols are more robust and democratic.

Luckily, a decentralized version does exist! It's a specification called Pavatar. The avatar is tied to a URL rather than an e-mail address. However, it's a bit less flexible, since it needs to remain simple on the server side. It's harder to set up and I doubt 99% of the users on the web would be capable of doing it. What would help Pavatar gain a wider audience would be Pavatar provider services. Hmmm...

So, I think might switch it to Pavatar sometime, with a possible fall-back to Gravatar. That takes significantly more work to set up than Gravatar does, so it's a future project. And, well, no one uses it yet either. I actually thought the project was dead until just now because their website was down the first time I visited it a couple months ago.

My second complaint is that Gravatar incorrectly assumes e-mail addresses are not case-sensitive. The domain part is, but the alias part is not. These two addresses could technically arrive to two different e-mail inboxes,

Pretty much every e-mail server will treat these as the same address as a convenience, because treating these differently would just be confusing, but it's not necessarily the case. Gravatar specifically says to hash the e-mail in lowercase form, so the unique address can't be used with the service.

So, go ahead and play in the comments a bit.

blog comments powered by Disqus

null program

Chris Wellons